Les recomiendo, de Carl Bildt, The principles at stake
Cito, pero recomiendo la lectura de todo el artículo:
Responsibility for the protection of the citizen and inhabitants of any state rests with the state concerned.
Every state has a responsibility to protect. But no state has the right to unilaterally intervene military in another state with the pretext of protecting its citizens.
In this case it should be noted that Russia has been handing out passport rather freely to the inhabitants of both South Ossetia and Abkhazia. There is little doubt that this has been part of a deliberate policy of gradually increasing Russian influence over these parts of Georgia.
The argument now used by the Kremlin to justify its intervention is not new in the history of Europe.
We have seen powers before claiming that the violations of the rights of holders of their passports or their nationality – by a previous Germany in Eastern Europe or a previous Serbia in former Yugoslavia – justify them sending their armies into these countries. We have seen the wars that have followed the application of that principle – and that is why it has repeatedly been made clear that it runs contrary to international law.
There are holders of Russian passport in numerous other European countries today. In many cases this is the result of historical circumstances. But in a Europe of increasingly open borders and accelerating integration – the Europe we seek! – we will increasingly see the holders of one passport living and working in another state.
Termina:
That’s why this conflict now is not only about South Ossetia and Georgia - it is about principles fundamental to the peace and stability of all of Europe. And the defence of these principles should be the duty of each and everyone of us.
Así es. Atando cabos con lo que Nicholas nos decía ayer en Rusia acusa a Ucrania de ayudar a Georgia y ¿qué tal si el siguiente paso ruso es Crimea?
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario